Crystal Palace46Index53Attack39Defense

Chances created and conceded
0.0+0.8+1.6+2.4+3.22026/27CRY
Solid: chances created. Dashed red: chances conceded. Both six-match rolling averages. A dashed vertical marks a new season. n = 38 matches. Chart R49bsnpfiv5snb.
Assessed fixtures
vs MCI
27% win
Squad projections — this week
Jean-Philippe MatetaG+A 0.3827% goal
Yeremi PinoG+A 0.344% goal
Adam WhartonG+A 0.312% goal
Tyrick MitchellG+A 0.288% goal
Ismaila SarrG+A 0.2116% goal
Daichi KamadaG+A 0.203% goal
Daniel MuñozG+A 0.209% goal
Jørgen Strand LarsenG+A 0.1311% goal
Points (2 played)
0
Expected points
2.1
Gap
-2.1
Table / xTable
19 / 12
Finishing
-2.2
Keeping
-2.0

Luck ledger · 2026/27

0231
— points · - - expected points · hover for any game

Match log · 2026/27

GameOpponentScorexGxGAxPtsPts
1@ Everton0-22.21.52.00
2Man City1-40.92.60.10

Style profile · how they play, not how good they are

Each axis is a percentile against the 19 other clubs with a profile this season, built from every shot Crystal Palace has taken and conceded in their last twelve matches. A club can sit high on these axes and still be poor — this describes character, not quality.

Style profile7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).Set-piece threat17thAerial88thCrossing83rdCarrying1stBig chances66thClose range88thChance quality66th
  • Creating
Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
AxisCreating
Set-piece threat17th
Aerial88th
Crossing83rd
Carrying1st
Big chances66th
Close range88th
Chance quality66th
Where Crystal Palace's threat comes from. Strongest trait: aerial (88th percentile). as of 2026-08-28
Style profile7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).Set-piece threat39thAerial83rdCrossing34thCarrying6thBig chances66thClose range66thChance quality72nd
  • Conceding
Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
AxisConceding
Set-piece threat39th
Aerial83rd
Crossing34th
Carrying6th
Big chances66th
Close range66th
Chance quality72nd
The shape of what they give up. Most exposed to: aerial (83rd percentile). as of 2026-08-28

Descriptive only. We tested whether style matchups improve match forecasts — a set-piece side against a set-piece-vulnerable defence, and so on — and the answer was no, to five decimal places. These profiles tell you what a match will look like, not who will win it.

Season shape · 2025/26

Home4-9-61923 goals · 3630 xG
Away7-3-92228 goals · 2730 xG
Proportional breakdown4 categories totalling 40.60%20%18%40SCORED
  • Open play60%
  • Penalties20%
  • From corners18%
  • Set pieces3%
Proportional breakdown — 4 categories totalling 40.
CategoryValueShare
Open play2460.0%
Penalties820.0%
From corners717.5%
Set pieces12.5%
Where Crystal Palace's goals came from, counted from shot data. Own goals by opponents are excluded, so this can total less than goals-for in the split above.
Proportional breakdown5 categories totalling 49.63%16%10%8%49CONCEDED
  • Open play63%
  • From corners16%
  • Penalties10%
  • Set pieces8%
  • Free kicks2%
Proportional breakdown — 5 categories totalling 49.
CategoryValueShare
Open play3163.3%
From corners816.3%
Penalties510.2%
Set pieces48.2%
Free kicks12.0%
Where the goals against arose. Own goals excluded, as above.
Who carried the threat
PlayerxGxAGA
Jean-Philippe Mateta16.01.2120
Ismaila Sarr11.52.291
Yeremi Pino4.48.522
Daniel Muñoz3.15.143
Jørgen Strand Larsen3.10.230
Maxence Lacroix3.01.312
Marc Guehi2.61.722
Justin Devenny2.20.310

Next up

Last season: 45 pts vs 53.2 xPts (-8.2) — finished 15, deserved 11.