Crystal Palace39Index53Attack27Defense

Chances created and conceded
0.0+0.8+1.6+2.4+3.22026/27CRY
Solid: chances created. Dashed red: chances conceded. Both six-match rolling averages. A dashed vertical marks a new season. n = 38 matches. Chart R49bsnpfiv5snb.
Assessed fixtures · 8 this season
vs NEW
42% win
GW8
at BHA
20% win
GW7
vs NOT
✓ called
GW6
at LEE
✗ missed
GW5
vs IPS
✗ missed
GW4
at FUL
✗ missed
GW3
vs MCI
✓ called
GW2
at EVE
✓ called
GW1
Squad projections — this week
Daichi KamadaG+A 0.4111% goal
Adam WhartonG+A 0.383% goal
Eddie NketiahG+A 0.267% goal
Tyrick MitchellG+A 0.2412% goal
Jørgen Strand LarsenG+A 0.1813% goal
Anan KhalailiG+A 0.159% goal
Quinten TimberG+A 0.103% goal
Chris RichardsG+A 0.054% goal
Points (6 played)
7
Expected points
5.9
Gap
+1.1
Table / xTable
12 / 18
Finishing
-0.8
Keeping
+1.8

Luck ledger · 2026/27

05915
— points · - - expected points · hover for any game

Match log · 2026/27

GameOpponentScorexGxGAxPtsPts
1@ Everton0-22.21.52.00
2Man City1-40.92.60.10
3@ Fulham3-22.42.91.23
4Ipswich2-30.92.00.50
5@ Leeds0-01.11.11.41
6Forest3-12.23.80.73

Style profile · how they play, not how good they are

Each axis is a percentile against the 19 other clubs with a profile this season, built from every shot Crystal Palace has taken and conceded in their last twelve matches. A club can sit high on these axes and still be poor — this describes character, not quality.

Style profile7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).Set-piece threat6thAerial83rdCrossing88thCarrying6thBig chances83rdClose range66thChance quality55th
  • Creating
Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
AxisCreating
Set-piece threat6th
Aerial83rd
Crossing88th
Carrying6th
Big chances83rd
Close range66th
Chance quality55th
Where Crystal Palace's threat comes from. Strongest trait: crossing (88th percentile). as of 2026-10-11
Style profile7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).Set-piece threat12thAerial66thCrossing12thCarrying83rdBig chances72ndClose range94thChance quality83rd
  • Conceding
Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
AxisConceding
Set-piece threat12th
Aerial66th
Crossing12th
Carrying83rd
Big chances72nd
Close range94th
Chance quality83rd
The shape of what they give up. Most exposed to: close range (94th percentile). as of 2026-10-11

Descriptive only. We tested whether style matchups improve match forecasts — a set-piece side against a set-piece-vulnerable defence, and so on — and the answer was no, to five decimal places. These profiles tell you what a match will look like, not who will win it.

Season shape · 2026/27

Home1-0-26–8 goals · 4–8 xG
Away1-1-13–4 goals · 6–5 xG
Proportional breakdown2 categories totalling 8.88%13%8SCORED
  • Open play88%
  • From corners13%
Proportional breakdown — 2 categories totalling 8.
CategoryValueShare
Open play787.5%
From corners112.5%
Where Crystal Palace's goals came from, counted from shot data. Own goals by opponents are excluded, so this can total less than goals-for in the split above.
Proportional breakdown2 categories totalling 12.92%8%12CONCEDED
  • Open play92%
  • Set pieces8%
Proportional breakdown — 2 categories totalling 12.
CategoryValueShare
Open play1191.7%
Set pieces18.3%
Where the goals against arose. Own goals excluded, as above.
Who carried the threat
PlayerxGxAGA
Eddie Nketiah1.31.701
Jean-Philippe Mateta1.30.000
Yeremi Pino1.01.110
Tyrick Mitchell1.00.620
Anan Khalaili1.00.310
Daichi Kamada1.00.913
Jørgen Strand Larsen1.00.210
Jefferson Lerma0.90.010

Next up

Last season: 45 pts vs 53.2 xPts (-8.2) — finished 15, deserved 11.