Sunderland30Index23Attack46Defense

Chances created and conceded
0.0+0.6+1.3+1.9+2.62026/27SUN
Solid: chances created. Dashed red: chances conceded. Both six-match rolling averages. A dashed vertical marks a new season. n = 38 matches. Chart R49bsnpfiv5snb.
Assessed fixtures
vs FUL
38% win
Squad projections — this week
Enzo Le FéeG+A 0.628% goal
Brian BrobbeyG+A 0.3424% goal
Trai HumeG+A 0.236% goal
Noah SadikiG+A 0.159% goal
Granit XhakaG+A 0.122% goal
Nordi MukieleG+A 0.075% goal
Nilson AnguloG+A 0.043% goal
Chemsdine TalbiG+A 0.043% goal
Points (2 played)
3
Expected points
2.8
Gap
+0.2
Table / xTable
11 / 7
Finishing
-0.7
Keeping
+0.6

Luck ledger · 2026/27

0241
— points · - - expected points · hover for any game

Match log · 2026/27

GameOpponentScorexGxGAxPtsPts
1@ Ipswich1-21.21.61.00
2Fulham1-01.61.01.83

Style profile · how they play, not how good they are

Each axis is a percentile against the 19 other clubs with a profile this season, built from every shot Sunderland has taken and conceded in their last twelve matches. A club can sit high on these axes and still be poor — this describes character, not quality.

Style profile7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).Set-piece threat23rdAerial28thCrossing1stCarrying12thBig chances45thClose range50thChance quality61st
  • Creating
Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
AxisCreating
Set-piece threat23rd
Aerial28th
Crossing1st
Carrying12th
Big chances45th
Close range50th
Chance quality61st
Where Sunderland's threat comes from. Strongest trait: chance quality (61st percentile). as of 2026-08-30
Style profile7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).Set-piece threat50thAerial72ndCrossing83rdCarrying28thBig chances39thClose range39thChance quality34th
  • Conceding
Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
AxisConceding
Set-piece threat50th
Aerial72nd
Crossing83rd
Carrying28th
Big chances39th
Close range39th
Chance quality34th
The shape of what they give up. Most exposed to: crossing (83rd percentile). as of 2026-08-30

Descriptive only. We tested whether style matchups improve match forecasts — a set-piece side against a set-piece-vulnerable defence, and so on — and the answer was no, to five decimal places. These profiles tell you what a match will look like, not who will win it.

Season shape · 2025/26

Home9-6-425–20 goals · 23–26 xG
Away5-6-817–28 goals · 20–35 xG
Proportional breakdown4 categories totalling 38.71%11%11%8%38SCORED
  • Open play71%
  • From corners11%
  • Penalties11%
  • Set pieces8%
Proportional breakdown — 4 categories totalling 38.
CategoryValueShare
Open play2771.1%
From corners410.5%
Penalties410.5%
Set pieces37.9%
Where Sunderland's goals came from, counted from shot data. Own goals by opponents are excluded, so this can total less than goals-for in the split above.
Proportional breakdown4 categories totalling 46.70%22%46CONCEDED
  • Open play70%
  • From corners22%
  • Penalties4%
  • Set pieces4%
Proportional breakdown — 4 categories totalling 46.
CategoryValueShare
Open play3269.6%
From corners1021.7%
Penalties24.3%
Set pieces24.3%
Where the goals against arose. Own goals excluded, as above.
Who carried the threat
PlayerxGxAGA
Brian Brobbey7.11.571
Wilson Isidor5.60.060
Enzo Le Fée5.37.556
Dan Ballard3.71.620
Habib Diarra3.30.622
Nordi Mukiele2.82.833
Trai Hume2.72.121
Chemsdine Talbi2.30.641

Next up

Last season: 54 pts vs 40.0 xPts (+14.0) — finished 7, deserved 18.