Nottingham Forest47Index47Attack48Defense

Chances created and conceded
0.0+0.7+1.4+2.0+2.72026/27NOT
Solid: chances created. Dashed red: chances conceded. Both six-match rolling averages. A dashed vertical marks a new season. n = 38 matches. Chart R49bsnpfiv5snb.
Assessed fixtures · 8 this season
at IPS
47% win
GW8
vs ARS
21% win
GW7
at CRY
✓ called
GW6
vs COV
✗ missed
GW5
at AVL
✗ missed
GW4
vs TOT
✗ missed
GW3
at LIV
✗ missed
GW2
vs LEE
✓ called
GW1
Squad projections — this week
Morgan Gibbs-WhiteG+A 0.5518% goal
Dan NdoyeG+A 0.3115% goal
James McAteeG+A 0.224% goal
Liam DelapG+A 0.1812% goal
Neco WilliamsG+A 0.134% goal
Igor JesusG+A 0.1210% goal
Daniel MuñozG+A 0.073% goal
MurilloG+A 0.054% goal
Points (6 played)
5
Expected points
11.3
Gap
-6.3
Table / xTable
15 / 3
Finishing
-7.2
Keeping
-0.7

Luck ledger · 2026/27

071415
— points · - - expected points · hover for any game

Match log · 2026/27

GameOpponentScorexGxGAxPtsPts
1Leeds0-10.70.51.50
2@ Liverpool2-22.91.32.51
3Spurs0-00.81.50.81
4@ Aston Villa2-12.81.12.53
5Coventry0-11.30.71.90
6@ Crystal Palace1-33.82.22.20

Style profile · how they play, not how good they are

Each axis is a percentile against the 19 other clubs with a profile this season, built from every shot Forest has taken and conceded in their last twelve matches. A club can sit high on these axes and still be poor — this describes character, not quality.

Style profile7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).Set-piece threat61stAerial61stCrossing83rdCarrying55thBig chances50thClose range72ndChance quality77th
  • Creating
Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
AxisCreating
Set-piece threat61st
Aerial61st
Crossing83rd
Carrying55th
Big chances50th
Close range72nd
Chance quality77th
Where Forest's threat comes from. Strongest trait: crossing (83rd percentile). as of 2026-10-11
Style profile7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).Set-piece threat55thAerial45thCrossing94thCarrying28thBig chances12thClose range23rdChance quality6th
  • Conceding
Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
AxisConceding
Set-piece threat55th
Aerial45th
Crossing94th
Carrying28th
Big chances12th
Close range23rd
Chance quality6th
The shape of what they give up. Most exposed to: crossing (94th percentile). as of 2026-10-11

Descriptive only. We tested whether style matchups improve match forecasts — a set-piece side against a set-piece-vulnerable defence, and so on — and the answer was no, to five decimal places. These profiles tell you what a match will look like, not who will win it.

Season shape · 2026/27

Home0-1-20–2 goals · 3–3 xG
Away1-1-15–6 goals · 9–5 xG
Proportional breakdown2 categories totalling 5.80%20%5SCORED
  • Open play80%
  • Penalties20%
Proportional breakdown — 2 categories totalling 5.
CategoryValueShare
Open play480.0%
Penalties120.0%
Where Forest's goals came from, counted from shot data. Own goals by opponents are excluded, so this can total less than goals-for in the split above.
Proportional breakdown3 categories totalling 8.63%25%13%8CONCEDED
  • Open play63%
  • From corners25%
  • Free kicks13%
Proportional breakdown — 3 categories totalling 8.
CategoryValueShare
Open play562.5%
From corners225.0%
Free kicks112.5%
Where the goals against arose. Own goals excluded, as above.
Who carried the threat
PlayerxGxAGA
Dan Ndoye2.91.720
Igor Jesus2.20.210
Liam Delap2.20.710
Morgan Gibbs-White1.62.912
Daniel Muñoz0.70.600
Murillo0.60.201
Neco Williams0.60.900
Chris Wood0.50.000

Next up

Last season: 44 pts vs 43.8 xPts (+0.2) — finished 16, deserved 16.