Nottingham Forest43Index42Attack47Defense

Chances created and conceded
0.0+0.7+1.4+2.0+2.72026/27NOT
Solid: chances created. Dashed red: chances conceded. Both six-match rolling averages. A dashed vertical marks a new season. n = 38 matches. Chart R49bsnpfiv5snb.
Assessed fixtures
at LIV
18% win
Squad projections — this week
Morgan Gibbs-WhiteG+A 0.6932% goal
Igor JesusG+A 0.6337% goal
Neco WilliamsG+A 0.329% goal
Dan NdoyeG+A 0.176% goal
James McAteeG+A 0.172% goal
Omari HutchinsonG+A 0.142% goal
Chris WoodG+A 0.1411% goal
Nicolás DomínguezG+A 0.123% goal
Points (2 played)
1
Expected points
4.0
Gap
-3.0
Table / xTable
15 / 4
Finishing
-1.5
Keeping
-1.3

Luck ledger · 2026/27

0361
— points · - - expected points · hover for any game

Match log · 2026/27

GameOpponentScorexGxGAxPtsPts
1Leeds0-10.70.51.50
2@ Liverpool2-22.91.32.51

Style profile · how they play, not how good they are

Each axis is a percentile against the 19 other clubs with a profile this season, built from every shot Forest has taken and conceded in their last twelve matches. A club can sit high on these axes and still be poor — this describes character, not quality.

Style profile7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).Set-piece threat66thAerial61stCrossing99thCarrying88thBig chances83rdClose range72ndChance quality83rd
  • Creating
Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
AxisCreating
Set-piece threat66th
Aerial61st
Crossing99th
Carrying88th
Big chances83rd
Close range72nd
Chance quality83rd
Where Forest's threat comes from. Strongest trait: crossing (99th percentile). as of 2026-08-29
Style profile7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).Set-piece threat72ndAerial1stCrossing72ndCarrying61stBig chances45thClose range1stChance quality12th
  • Conceding
Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
AxisConceding
Set-piece threat72nd
Aerial1st
Crossing72nd
Carrying61st
Big chances45th
Close range1st
Chance quality12th
The shape of what they give up. Most exposed to: set-piece threat (72nd percentile). as of 2026-08-29

Descriptive only. We tested whether style matchups improve match forecasts — a set-piece side against a set-piece-vulnerable defence, and so on — and the answer was no, to five decimal places. These profiles tell you what a match will look like, not who will win it.

Season shape · 2025/26

Home4-8-72023 goals · 2828 xG
Away7-3-92828 goals · 2137 xG
Proportional breakdown5 categories totalling 47.72%15%6%47SCORED
  • Open play72%
  • From corners15%
  • Penalties6%
  • Set pieces4%
  • Free kicks2%
Proportional breakdown — 5 categories totalling 47.
CategoryValueShare
Open play3472.3%
From corners714.9%
Penalties36.4%
Set pieces24.3%
Free kicks12.1%
Where Forest's goals came from, counted from shot data. Own goals by opponents are excluded, so this can total less than goals-for in the split above.
Proportional breakdown5 categories totalling 48.65%17%10%6%48CONCEDED
  • Open play65%
  • From corners17%
  • Penalties10%
  • Set pieces6%
  • Free kicks2%
Proportional breakdown — 5 categories totalling 48.
CategoryValueShare
Open play3164.6%
From corners816.7%
Penalties510.4%
Set pieces36.3%
Free kicks12.1%
Where the goals against arose. Own goals excluded, as above.
Who carried the threat
PlayerxGxAGA
Morgan Gibbs-White11.74.5154
Igor Jesus7.22.364
Taiwo Awoniyi4.31.341
Elliot Anderson3.44.844
Chris Wood3.40.330
Callum Hudson-Odoi3.03.934
Omari Hutchinson2.24.915
Morato1.90.110

Next up

Last season: 44 pts vs 43.8 xPts (+0.2) — finished 16, deserved 16.