Leeds United51Index48Attack54Defense

Chances created and conceded
0.0+0.6+1.2+1.8+2.42026/27LEE
Solid: chances created. Dashed red: chances conceded. Both six-match rolling averages. A dashed vertical marks a new season. n = 38 matches. Chart R49bsnpfiv5snb.
Assessed fixtures
vs BRE
41% win
Squad projections — this week
Dominic Calvert-LewinG+A 0.4733% goal
Lukas NmechaG+A 0.2910% goal
James JustinG+A 0.229% goal
Brenden AaronsonG+A 0.173% goal
Jayden BogleG+A 0.110% goal
Ao TanakaG+A 0.116% goal
Jaka BijolG+A 0.082% goal
Ethan AmpaduG+A 0.073% goal
Points (2 played)
4
Expected points
2.0
Gap
+2.0
Table / xTable
7 / 14
Finishing
+0.4
Keeping
+1.3

Luck ledger · 2026/27

0361
— points · - - expected points · hover for any game

Match log · 2026/27

GameOpponentScorexGxGAxPtsPts
1@ Forest1-00.50.71.13
2Brentford1-11.11.60.91

Style profile · how they play, not how good they are

Each axis is a percentile against the 19 other clubs with a profile this season, built from every shot Leeds has taken and conceded in their last twelve matches. A club can sit high on these axes and still be poor — this describes character, not quality.

Style profile7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).Set-piece threat12thAerial94thCrossing77thCarrying61stBig chances17thClose range66thChance quality34th
  • Creating
Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
AxisCreating
Set-piece threat12th
Aerial94th
Crossing77th
Carrying61st
Big chances17th
Close range66th
Chance quality34th
Where Leeds's threat comes from. Strongest trait: aerial (94th percentile). as of 2026-08-30
Style profile7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).Set-piece threat88thAerial94thCrossing61stCarrying12thBig chances1stClose range94thChance quality17th
  • Conceding
Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
AxisConceding
Set-piece threat88th
Aerial94th
Crossing61st
Carrying12th
Big chances1st
Close range94th
Chance quality17th
The shape of what they give up. Most exposed to: aerial (94th percentile). as of 2026-08-30

Descriptive only. We tested whether style matchups improve match forecasts — a set-piece side against a set-piece-vulnerable defence, and so on — and the answer was no, to five decimal places. These profiles tell you what a match will look like, not who will win it.

Season shape · 2025/26

Home9-5-529–21 goals · 33–23 xG
Away2-9-820–35 goals · 26–33 xG
Proportional breakdown5 categories totalling 48.63%15%13%6%48SCORED
  • Open play63%
  • From corners15%
  • Penalties13%
  • Free kicks6%
  • Set pieces4%
Proportional breakdown — 5 categories totalling 48.
CategoryValueShare
Open play3062.5%
From corners714.6%
Penalties612.5%
Free kicks36.3%
Set pieces24.2%
Where Leeds's goals came from, counted from shot data. Own goals by opponents are excluded, so this can total less than goals-for in the split above.
Proportional breakdown5 categories totalling 54.65%19%11%54CONCEDED
  • Open play65%
  • From corners19%
  • Penalties11%
  • Free kicks4%
  • Set pieces2%
Proportional breakdown — 5 categories totalling 54.
CategoryValueShare
Open play3564.8%
From corners1018.5%
Penalties611.1%
Free kicks23.7%
Set pieces11.9%
Where the goals against arose. Own goals excluded, as above.
Who carried the threat
PlayerxGxAGA
Dominic Calvert-Lewin18.71.5141
Lukas Nmecha8.11.761
Noah Okafor6.32.381
Brenden Aaronson5.95.745
Pascal Struijk3.01.101
Anton Stach2.96.053
James Justin2.62.621
Ao Tanaka2.21.420

Next up

Last season: 47 pts vs 57.7 xPts (-10.7) — finished 14, deserved 8.