Bournemouth58Index63Attack48Defense

Chances created and conceded
0.0+0.6+1.2+1.8+2.52026/27BOU
Solid: chances created. Dashed red: chances conceded. Both six-match rolling averages. A dashed vertical marks a new season. n = 38 matches. Chart R49bsnpfiv5snb.
Assessed fixtures
vs EVE
55% win
Squad projections — this week
Marcus TavernierG+A 0.6425% goal
RayanG+A 0.4820% goal
EvanilsonG+A 0.3817% goal
Adrien TruffertG+A 0.3013% goal
Eli Junior KroupiG+A 0.2520% goal
Alex ScottG+A 0.195% goal
Tyler AdamsG+A 0.181% goal
James HillG+A 0.152% goal
Points (2 played)
1
Expected points
2.1
Gap
-1.1
Table / xTable
14 / 11
Finishing
-1.0
Keeping
+1.1

Luck ledger · 2026/27

0231
— points · - - expected points · hover for any game

Match log · 2026/27

GameOpponentScorexGxGAxPtsPts
1@ Man City1-20.72.50.30
2Everton1-12.31.71.81

Style profile · how they play, not how good they are

Each axis is a percentile against the 19 other clubs with a profile this season, built from every shot Bournemouth has taken and conceded in their last twelve matches. A club can sit high on these axes and still be poor — this describes character, not quality.

Style profile7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).Set-piece threat1stAerial6thCrossing61stCarrying28thBig chances88thClose range23rdChance quality88th
  • Creating
Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
AxisCreating
Set-piece threat1st
Aerial6th
Crossing61st
Carrying28th
Big chances88th
Close range23rd
Chance quality88th
Where Bournemouth's threat comes from. Strongest trait: big chances (88th percentile). as of 2026-08-29
Style profile7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).Set-piece threat94thAerial55thCrossing55thCarrying88thBig chances17thClose range99thChance quality66th
  • Conceding
Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
AxisConceding
Set-piece threat94th
Aerial55th
Crossing55th
Carrying88th
Big chances17th
Close range99th
Chance quality66th
The shape of what they give up. Most exposed to: close range (99th percentile). as of 2026-08-29

Descriptive only. We tested whether style matchups improve match forecasts — a set-piece side against a set-piece-vulnerable defence, and so on — and the answer was no, to five decimal places. These profiles tell you what a match will look like, not who will win it.

Season shape · 2025/26

Home7-10-229–20 goals · 32–16 xG
Away6-8-529–34 goals · 35–41 xG
Proportional breakdown5 categories totalling 57.72%9%9%7%57SCORED
  • Open play72%
  • Penalties9%
  • Set pieces9%
  • From corners7%
  • Free kicks4%
Proportional breakdown — 5 categories totalling 57.
CategoryValueShare
Open play4171.9%
Penalties58.8%
Set pieces58.8%
From corners47.0%
Free kicks23.5%
Where Bournemouth's goals came from, counted from shot data. Own goals by opponents are excluded, so this can total less than goals-for in the split above.
Proportional breakdown5 categories totalling 51.55%18%12%8%8%51CONCEDED
  • Open play55%
  • From corners18%
  • Penalties12%
  • Free kicks8%
  • Set pieces8%
Proportional breakdown — 5 categories totalling 51.
CategoryValueShare
Open play2854.9%
From corners917.6%
Penalties611.8%
Free kicks47.8%
Set pieces47.8%
Where the goals against arose. Own goals excluded, as above.
Who carried the threat
PlayerxGxAGA
Evanilson11.83.161
Marcus Tavernier9.46.274
Eli Junior Kroupi8.81.8130
Antoine Semenyo7.92.5103
David Brooks6.54.213
Amine Adli3.61.331
Alex Scott3.52.931
Rayan2.72.852

Next up

Last season: 57 pts vs 62.3 xPts (-5.3) — finished 6, deserved 4.