Compare players
Percentile profiles overlaid, on the measures that suit the position being judged — two midfielders on creation and build-up, two defenders on what they concede.
| Metric | Udol | Belkebla |
|---|---|---|
| Creatingexpected assists per 90 | 97 ▲ | 9 |
| Key passeskey passes per 90 | 82 ▲ | 15 |
| Build-upexpected-goal chain per 90 | 75 ▲ | 11 |
| Scoringnon-penalty expected goals per 90 | 60 ▲ | 2 |
| Shot volumeshots per 90 | 57 ▲ | 2 |
| Box presenceshots inside the box per 90 | 84 ▲ | 5 |
| Defendingon-pitch xGA per 90 (team context; lower is better — already inverted) | 80 ▲ | 15 |
| Disciplinecards per 90, reds double (fewer is better — already inverted) | 85 ▲ | 39 |
Matthieu Udol leads on creating; Matthieu Udol leads on key passes; Matthieu Udol leads on build-up; Matthieu Udol leads on scoring; Matthieu Udol leads on shot volume; Matthieu Udol leads on box presence; Matthieu Udol leads on defending; Matthieu Udol leads on discipline.
Midfielder axes. Creation and build-up first, goal threat after. The defending axis is team context, not his own ball-winning. Every value is a percentile against the 170 midfielders with 456+ minutes — a real body of evidence, not everyone who took the field. Axis order is fixed per position so the same shape always means the same thing.
Percentiles are against Ligue 1 players in the same position — not against the Premier League. A 90 here and a 90 there are two different claims.