Compare players
Percentile profiles overlaid, on the measures that suit the position being judged — two midfielders on creation and build-up, two defenders on what they concede.
| Metric | Mbeumo | Gibbs-White |
|---|---|---|
| Creatingexpected assists per 90 | 72 | 92 ▲ |
| Key passeskey passes per 90 | 78 | 94 ▲ |
| Build-upexpected-goal chain per 90 | 94 ▲ | 69 |
| Scoringnon-penalty expected goals per 90 | 96 ▲ | 57 |
| Shot volumeshots per 90 | 98 ▲ | 64 |
| Box presenceshots inside the box per 90 | 96 ▲ | 71 |
| Defendingon-pitch xGA per 90 (team context; lower is better — already inverted) | 59 | 96 ▲ |
| Disciplinecards per 90, reds double (fewer is better — already inverted) | 48 | 74 ▲ |
Morgan Gibbs-White leads on creating; Morgan Gibbs-White leads on key passes; Bryan Mbeumo leads on build-up; Bryan Mbeumo leads on scoring; Bryan Mbeumo leads on shot volume; Bryan Mbeumo leads on box presence; Morgan Gibbs-White leads on defending; Morgan Gibbs-White leads on discipline.
Midfielder axes. Creation and build-up first, goal threat after. The defending axis is team context, not his own ball-winning. Every value is a percentile against the 114 midfielders with 180+ minutes — a real body of evidence, not everyone who took the field. Axis order is fixed per position so the same shape always means the same thing.
These are descriptive, not predictive. They say what a player has done per 90 minutes this season, not what he will do next weekend — that is the matchday board, which projects goals and assists for specific fixtures. 57 players carry a published profile; each is ranked against the regulars of his own position, and every chart above names that peer group and its size.