Compare players
Percentile profiles overlaid, on the measures that suit the position being judged — two midfielders on creation and build-up, two defenders on what they concede.
| Metric | Milla | Febas |
|---|---|---|
| Creatingexpected assists per 90 | 72 ▲ | 24 |
| Key passeskey passes per 90 | 92 ▲ | 24 |
| Build-upexpected-goal chain per 90 | 7 | 65 ▲ |
| Scoringnon-penalty expected goals per 90 | 21 | 30 ▲ |
| Shot volumeshots per 90 | 25 ▲ | 19 |
| Box presenceshots inside the box per 90 | 13 | 36 ▲ |
| Defendingon-pitch xGA per 90 (team context; lower is better — already inverted) | 79 ▲ | 22 |
| Disciplinecards per 90, reds double (fewer is better — already inverted) | 65 ▲ | 31 |
Luis Milla leads on creating; Luis Milla leads on key passes; Aleix Febas leads on build-up; Aleix Febas leads on scoring; Luis Milla leads on shot volume; Aleix Febas leads on box presence; Luis Milla leads on defending; Luis Milla leads on discipline.
Midfielder axes. Creation and build-up first, goal threat after. The defending axis is team context, not his own ball-winning. Every value is a percentile against the 185 midfielders with 451+ minutes — a real body of evidence, not everyone who took the field. Axis order is fixed per position so the same shape always means the same thing.
Percentiles are against La Liga players in the same position — not against the Premier League. A 90 here and a 90 there are two different claims.