Compare players
Percentile profiles overlaid, on the measures that suit the position being judged — two midfielders on creation and build-up, two defenders on what they concede.
| Metric | Eggestein | Sano |
|---|---|---|
| Creatingexpected assists per 90 | 9 | 41 ▲ |
| Key passeskey passes per 90 | 14 | 24 ▲ |
| Build-upexpected-goal chain per 90 | 24 | 42 ▲ |
| Scoringnon-penalty expected goals per 90 | 41 ▲ | 15 |
| Shot volumeshots per 90 | 48 ▲ | 17 |
| Box presenceshots inside the box per 90 | 54 ▲ | 14 |
| Defendingon-pitch xGA per 90 (team context; lower is better — already inverted) | 67 ▲ | 36 |
| Disciplinecards per 90, reds double (fewer is better — already inverted) | 70 | 86 ▲ |
Kaishu Sano leads on creating; Kaishu Sano leads on key passes; Kaishu Sano leads on build-up; Maximilian Eggestein leads on scoring; Maximilian Eggestein leads on shot volume; Maximilian Eggestein leads on box presence; Maximilian Eggestein leads on defending; Kaishu Sano leads on discipline.
Midfielder axes. Creation and build-up first, goal threat after. The defending axis is team context, not his own ball-winning. Every value is a percentile against the 164 midfielders with 451+ minutes — a real body of evidence, not everyone who took the field. Axis order is fixed per position so the same shape always means the same thing.
Percentiles are against Bundesliga players in the same position — not against the Premier League. A 90 here and a 90 there are two different claims.