Compare players
Percentile profiles overlaid, on the measures that suit the position being judged — two midfielders on creation and build-up, two defenders on what they concede.
| Metric | Ramadani | Karlström |
|---|---|---|
| Creatingexpected assists per 90 | 14 ▲ | 8 |
| Key passeskey passes per 90 | 12 ▲ | 10 |
| Build-upexpected-goal chain per 90 | 11 | 17 ▲ |
| Scoringnon-penalty expected goals per 90 | 18 ▲ | 13 |
| Shot volumeshots per 90 | 38 ▲ | 17 |
| Box presenceshots inside the box per 90 | 6 | 27 ▲ |
| Defendingon-pitch xGA per 90 (team context; lower is better — already inverted) | 15 | 38 ▲ |
| Disciplinecards per 90, reds double (fewer is better — already inverted) | 26 | 49 ▲ |
Ylber Ramadani leads on creating; Ylber Ramadani leads on key passes; Jesper Karlström leads on build-up; Ylber Ramadani leads on scoring; Ylber Ramadani leads on shot volume; Jesper Karlström leads on box presence; Jesper Karlström leads on defending; Jesper Karlström leads on discipline.
Midfielder axes. Creation and build-up first, goal threat after. The defending axis is team context, not his own ball-winning. Every value is a percentile against the 199 midfielders with 460+ minutes — a real body of evidence, not everyone who took the field. Axis order is fixed per position so the same shape always means the same thing.
Percentiles are against Serie A players in the same position — not against the Premier League. A 90 here and a 90 there are two different claims.