Serie A · 2026/27

Napoli68Index61Attack77Defense

WDWLL

Assessed fixtures

Chances created and conceded, against 220 club-seasons of this league

hover a club to isolate it

Percentile against 220 club-seasons of league history, 2025 season. Higher is better on every spoke, including the ones where a low raw number is the good one. n = 220 club-seasons.

Chances created and conceded

Solid: chances created. Dashed red: chances conceded. Both six-match rolling averages. A dashed vertical marks a new season. n = 38 matches.

Season shape · 2026/27

Home2-0-15–2 goals · 7–2 xG

Away1-1-15–4 goals · 6–5 xG

Open play80%
From corners10%
Penalties10%

Proportional breakdown — 3 categories totalling 10.
Category	Value	Share
Open play	8	80.0%
From corners	1	10.0%
Penalties	1	10.0%

Where Napoli's goals came from, counted from shot data. Own goals by opponents are excluded, so this can total less than goals-for in the split above.

Open play83%
From corners17%

Proportional breakdown — 2 categories totalling 6.
Category	Value	Share
Open play	5	83.3%
From corners	1	16.7%

Where the goals against arose. Own goals excluded, as above.

Who carried the threat

Player	xG	xA	G	A
Rasmus Højlund	13.3	3.3	13	5
Scott McTominay	12.4	2.0	10	3
Matteo Politano	3.1	5.6	2	6
Kevin De Bruyne	3.5	4.0	5	2
Eljif Elmas	3.6	1.8	1	3
David Neres	1.5	3.8	3	3
Giovanni Di Lorenzo	2.0	3.0	2	1
Franck Zambo	2.6	1.6	4	1
Leonardo Spinazzola	1.2	2.6	3	3
Noa Lang	1.4	2.0	1	2

Chance quality, match by match

xG created
xG conceded

Time series — 2 series over 6 time points.
matchday (1–6)	xG created	xG conceded
1	1.2	0.50
2	1.0	1.1
3	2.3	3.8
4	2.3	0.17
5	2.1	1.1
6	3.5	0.79

Per-match chance quality across 6 matches — creation vs concession. Crossovers are where seasons turn.

Style profile · how they play, not how good they are

Each axis is a percentile against the 20 other clubs with a profile this season, built from every shot Napoli has taken and conceded in their last twelve matches. A club can sit high on these axes and still be poor — this describes character, not quality.

Creating

Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
Axis	Creating
Set-piece threat	27th
Aerial	53rd
Crossing	63rd
Carrying	42nd
Big chances	47th
Close range	47th
Chance quality	37th

Where Napoli's threat comes from. Strongest trait: crossing (63rd percentile). as of 2026-10-10

Conceding

Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
Axis	Conceding
Set-piece threat	1st
Aerial	11th
Crossing	6th
Carrying	1st
Big chances	6th
Close range	22nd
Chance quality	6th

The shape of what they give up. Most exposed to: close range (22nd percentile). as of 2026-10-10

Descriptive only. We tested whether style matchups improve match forecasts — a set-piece side against a set-piece-vulnerable defence, and so on — and the answer was no, to five decimal places. These profiles tell you what a match will look like, not who will win it.

Luck ledger · 2026/27

— points · - - expected points · hover for any game

Match log

Game	Opponent	Score	xG	xGA	xPts	Pts
1	@ Genoa	2-0	1.2	0.5	2.0	3
2	Como	1-2	1.0	1.1	1.3	0
3	@ Inter	2-3	2.3	3.8	0.6	0
4	Bologna	1-0	2.3	0.2	2.8	3
5	@ Fiorentina	1-1	2.1	1.1	2.2	1
6	Frosinone	3-0	3.5	0.8	2.9	3

Latest results

2026-10-10Napoli3–0FrosinonexG 3.5–0.8

2026-09-20Fiorentina1–1NapolixG 1.1–2.1

2026-09-13Napoli1–0BolognaxG 2.3–0.2

2026-09-05Inter3–2NapolixG 3.8–2.3

2026-08-30Napoli1–2ComoxG 1.0–1.1

2026-08-22Genoa0–2NapolixG 0.5–1.2