Serie A · 2026/27

Inter87Index92Attack77Defense

WW
Assessed fixtures
at CAGfull time1–0
Chances created and conceded, against 220 club-seasons of this league
npxG /90Shots /90Close-range shareFinishing /90Chance qualityBig-chance sharenpxG conceded /90Shots faced /90Close-range concededQuality concededBig chances facedKeeping /90Set-piece shareCorner shareSet-piece conceded
hover a club to isolate it
Percentile against 220 club-seasons of league history, 2025 season. Higher is better on every spoke, including the ones where a low raw number is the good one. n = 220 club-seasons.
Chances created and conceded
0.0+0.9+1.8+2.7+3.62026/27INT
Solid: chances created. Dashed red: chances conceded. Both six-match rolling averages. A dashed vertical marks a new season. n = 38 matches. Chart R4pbsnpfiv5snb.

Season shape · 2026/27

Home1-0-041 goals · 21 xG
Away1-0-010 goals · 40 xG
Proportional breakdown2 categories totalling 5.80%20%5SCORED
  • Open play80%
  • From corners20%
Proportional breakdown — 2 categories totalling 5.
CategoryValueShare
Open play480.0%
From corners120.0%
Where Inter's goals came from, counted from shot data. Own goals by opponents are excluded, so this can total less than goals-for in the split above.
Proportional breakdown1 categories totalling 1.100%1CONCEDED
  • Open play100%
Proportional breakdown — 1 categories totalling 1.
CategoryValueShare
Open play1100.0%
Where the goals against arose. Own goals excluded, as above.
Who carried the threat
PlayerxGxAGA
Lautaro Martínez17.16.3176
Federico Dimarco7.315.9716
Marcus Thuram11.94.5136
Francesco Pio Esposito9.92.173
Nicolò Barella3.88.038
Henrikh Mkhitaryan6.03.341
Hakan Calhanoglu5.13.594
Ange-Yoan Bonny4.62.754
Piotr Zielinski2.14.263
Petar Sucic2.24.022

Style profile · how they play, not how good they are

Each axis is a percentile against the 20 other clubs with a profile this season, built from every shot Inter has taken and conceded in their last twelve matches. A club can sit high on these axes and still be poor — this describes character, not quality.

Style profile7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).Set-piece threat6thAerial84thCrossing94thCarrying22ndBig chances84thClose range94thChance quality94th
  • Creating
Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
AxisCreating
Set-piece threat6th
Aerial84th
Crossing94th
Carrying22nd
Big chances84th
Close range94th
Chance quality94th
Where Inter's threat comes from. Strongest trait: crossing (94th percentile). as of 2026-08-30
Style profile7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).Set-piece threat16thAerial22ndCrossing58thCarrying84thBig chances63rdClose range58thChance quality53rd
  • Conceding
Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
AxisConceding
Set-piece threat16th
Aerial22nd
Crossing58th
Carrying84th
Big chances63rd
Close range58th
Chance quality53rd
The shape of what they give up. Most exposed to: carrying (84th percentile). as of 2026-08-30

Descriptive only. We tested whether style matchups improve match forecasts — a set-piece side against a set-piece-vulnerable defence, and so on — and the answer was no, to five decimal places. These profiles tell you what a match will look like, not who will win it.

Luck ledger · 2026/27

0481
— points · - - expected points · hover for any game

Match log

GameOpponentScorexGxGAxPtsPts
1Monza4-11.51.21.63
2@ Cagliari1-04.00.32.93

Latest results

2026-08-30Cagliari01InterxG 0.34.0
2026-08-22Inter41MonzaxG 1.51.2