Serie A · 2026/27

Como70Index68Attack71Defense

DLWWW

Assessed fixtures

Chances created and conceded, against 220 club-seasons of this league

hover a club to isolate it

Percentile against 220 club-seasons of league history, 2025 season. Higher is better on every spoke, including the ones where a low raw number is the good one. n = 220 club-seasons.

Chances created and conceded

Solid: chances created. Dashed red: chances conceded. Both six-match rolling averages. A dashed vertical marks a new season. n = 38 matches.

Season shape · 2026/27

Home1-1-02–1 goals · 6–3 xG

Away2-1-17–5 goals · 8–6 xG

Open play78%
From corners22%

Proportional breakdown — 2 categories totalling 9.
Category	Value	Share
Open play	7	77.8%
From corners	2	22.2%

Where Como's goals came from, counted from shot data. Own goals by opponents are excluded, so this can total less than goals-for in the split above.

Open play100%

Proportional breakdown — 1 categories totalling 6.
Category	Value	Share
Open play	6	100.0%

Where the goals against arose. Own goals excluded, as above.

Who carried the threat

Player	xG	xA	G	A
Tasos Douvikas	15.2	2.2	14	1
Nico Paz	8.9	7.0	12	6
Lucas Da Cunha	6.9	6.0	6	4
Jesús Rodriguez	3.9	7.0	2	9
Martin Baturina	1.9	6.7	6	3
Jacobo Ramón	5.5	1.0	2	0
Álvaro Morata	4.9	0.8	0	1
Máximo Perrone	2.5	2.5	3	4
Assane Diao	3.2	1.7	2	1
Mergim Vojvoda	1.5	3.1	2	2

Chance quality, match by match

xG created
xG conceded

Time series — 2 series over 6 time points.
matchday (1–6)	xG created	xG conceded
1	2.4	2.1
2	1.1	1.0
3	2.0	0.92
4	3.8	1.6
5	2.3	2.3
6	1.9	1.1

Per-match chance quality across 6 matches — creation vs concession. Crossovers are where seasons turn.

Style profile · how they play, not how good they are

Each axis is a percentile against the 20 other clubs with a profile this season, built from every shot Como has taken and conceded in their last twelve matches. A club can sit high on these axes and still be poor — this describes character, not quality.

Creating

Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
Axis	Creating
Set-piece threat	47th
Aerial	89th
Crossing	89th
Carrying	58th
Big chances	37th
Close range	58th
Chance quality	42nd

Where Como's threat comes from. Strongest trait: aerial (89th percentile). as of 2026-10-11

Conceding

Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
Axis	Conceding
Set-piece threat	78th
Aerial	53rd
Crossing	32nd
Carrying	6th
Big chances	58th
Close range	47th
Chance quality	58th

The shape of what they give up. Most exposed to: set-piece threat (78th percentile). as of 2026-10-11

Descriptive only. We tested whether style matchups improve match forecasts — a set-piece side against a set-piece-vulnerable defence, and so on — and the answer was no, to five decimal places. These profiles tell you what a match will look like, not who will win it.

Luck ledger · 2026/27

— points · - - expected points · hover for any game

Match log

Game	Opponent	Score	xG	xGA	xPts	Pts
1	@ Udinese	1-1	2.4	2.1	1.6	1
2	@ Napoli	2-1	1.1	1.0	1.4	3
3	@ Genoa	4-1	2.0	0.9	2.2	3
4	Parma	2-1	3.8	1.6	2.6	3
5	@ Frosinone	0-2	2.3	2.3	1.5	0
6	Roma	0-0	1.9	1.1	1.9	1

Latest results

2026-10-11Como0–0RomaxG 1.9–1.1

2026-09-20Frosinone2–0ComoxG 2.3–2.3

2026-09-14Como2–1ParmaxG 3.8–1.6

2026-09-04Genoa1–4ComoxG 0.9–2.0

2026-08-30Napoli1–2ComoxG 1.0–1.1

2026-08-22Udinese1–1ComoxG 2.1–2.4