Serie A · 2026/27

Como71Index70Attack70Defense

WD
Assessed fixtures
at NAPfull time2–1
Chances created and conceded, against 220 club-seasons of this league
npxG /90Shots /90Close-range shareFinishing /90Chance qualityBig-chance sharenpxG conceded /90Shots faced /90Close-range concededQuality concededBig chances facedKeeping /90Set-piece shareCorner shareSet-piece conceded
hover a club to isolate it
Percentile against 220 club-seasons of league history, 2025 season. Higher is better on every spoke, including the ones where a low raw number is the good one. n = 220 club-seasons.
Chances created and conceded
0.0+0.8+1.5+2.3+3.12026/27COM
Solid: chances created. Dashed red: chances conceded. Both six-match rolling averages. A dashed vertical marks a new season. n = 38 matches. Chart R4pbsnpfiv5snb.

Season shape · 2026/27

Home0-0-000 goals · 00 xG
Away1-1-032 goals · 43 xG
Proportional breakdown2 categories totalling 3.67%33%3SCORED
  • Open play67%
  • From corners33%
Proportional breakdown — 2 categories totalling 3.
CategoryValueShare
Open play266.7%
From corners133.3%
Where Como's goals came from, counted from shot data. Own goals by opponents are excluded, so this can total less than goals-for in the split above.
Proportional breakdown1 categories totalling 2.100%2CONCEDED
  • Open play100%
Proportional breakdown — 1 categories totalling 2.
CategoryValueShare
Open play2100.0%
Where the goals against arose. Own goals excluded, as above.
Who carried the threat
PlayerxGxAGA
Tasos Douvikas15.22.2141
Nico Paz8.97.0126
Lucas Da Cunha6.96.064
Jesús Rodriguez3.97.029
Martin Baturina1.96.763
Jacobo Ramón5.51.020
Álvaro Morata4.90.801
Máximo Perrone2.52.534
Assane Diao3.21.721
Mergim Vojvoda1.53.122

Style profile · how they play, not how good they are

Each axis is a percentile against the 20 other clubs with a profile this season, built from every shot Como has taken and conceded in their last twelve matches. A club can sit high on these axes and still be poor — this describes character, not quality.

Style profile7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).Set-piece threat58thAerial89thCrossing84thCarrying37thBig chances63rdClose range73rdChance quality47th
  • Creating
Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
AxisCreating
Set-piece threat58th
Aerial89th
Crossing84th
Carrying37th
Big chances63rd
Close range73rd
Chance quality47th
Where Como's threat comes from. Strongest trait: aerial (89th percentile). as of 2026-08-30
Style profile7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).Set-piece threat68thAerial16thCrossing1stCarrying1stBig chances42ndClose range27thChance quality73rd
  • Conceding
Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
AxisConceding
Set-piece threat68th
Aerial16th
Crossing1st
Carrying1st
Big chances42nd
Close range27th
Chance quality73rd
The shape of what they give up. Most exposed to: chance quality (73rd percentile). as of 2026-08-30

Descriptive only. We tested whether style matchups improve match forecasts — a set-piece side against a set-piece-vulnerable defence, and so on — and the answer was no, to five decimal places. These profiles tell you what a match will look like, not who will win it.

Luck ledger · 2026/27

0361
— points · - - expected points · hover for any game

Match log

GameOpponentScorexGxGAxPtsPts
1@ Udinese1-12.42.11.61
2@ Napoli2-11.11.01.43

Latest results

2026-08-30Napoli12ComoxG 1.01.1
2026-08-22Udinese11ComoxG 2.12.4