Serie A · 2026/27

Parma23Index18Attack33Defense

LWLDL

Assessed fixtures

Chances created and conceded, against 220 club-seasons of this league

hover a club to isolate it

Percentile against 220 club-seasons of league history, 2025 season. Higher is better on every spoke, including the ones where a low raw number is the good one. n = 220 club-seasons.

Chances created and conceded

Solid: chances created. Dashed red: chances conceded. Both six-match rolling averages. A dashed vertical marks a new season. n = 38 matches.

Season shape · 2026/27

Home1-1-13–3 goals · 3–4 xG

Away0-0-31–7 goals · 2–9 xG

Open play100%

Proportional breakdown — 1 categories totalling 4.
Category	Value	Share
Open play	4	100.0%

Where Parma's goals came from, counted from shot data. Own goals by opponents are excluded, so this can total less than goals-for in the split above.

Open play80%
Penalties10%
From corners10%

Proportional breakdown — 3 categories totalling 10.
Category	Value	Share
Open play	8	80.0%
Penalties	1	10.0%
From corners	1	10.0%

Where the goals against arose. Own goals excluded, as above.

Who carried the threat

Player	xG	xA	G	A
Mateo Pellegrino	9.9	2.1	9	1
Adrián Bernabé	2.6	4.6	3	1
Emanuele Valeri	0.7	3.8	0	2
Patrick Cutrone	3.3	0.7	1	0
Adrian Benedyczak	2.0	1.5	1	1
Enrico Del Prato	2.3	0.8	2	0
Gaetano Oristanio	2.4	0.6	1	0
Oliver Sørensen	2.0	0.7	1	1
Nesta Elphege	2.3	0.4	2	1
Sascha Britschgi	0.4	2.0	0	2

Chance quality, match by match

xG created
xG conceded

Time series — 2 series over 6 time points.
matchday (1–6)	xG created	xG conceded
1	1.0	1.3
2	0.20	1.8
3	0.62	2.1
4	1.6	3.8
5	0.86	0.86
6	0.41	2.9

Per-match chance quality across 6 matches — creation vs concession. Crossovers are where seasons turn.

Style profile · how they play, not how good they are

Each axis is a percentile against the 20 other clubs with a profile this season, built from every shot Parma has taken and conceded in their last twelve matches. A club can sit high on these axes and still be poor — this describes character, not quality.

Creating

Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
Axis	Creating
Set-piece threat	89th
Aerial	84th
Crossing	94th
Carrying	94th
Big chances	42nd
Close range	89th
Chance quality	27th

Where Parma's threat comes from. Strongest trait: crossing (94th percentile). as of 2026-10-10

Conceding

Style profile — 7-axis radar comparing 1 profile(s).
Axis	Conceding
Set-piece threat	58th
Aerial	99th
Crossing	63rd
Carrying	53rd
Big chances	84th
Close range	84th
Chance quality	53rd

The shape of what they give up. Most exposed to: aerial (99th percentile). as of 2026-10-10

Descriptive only. We tested whether style matchups improve match forecasts — a set-piece side against a set-piece-vulnerable defence, and so on — and the answer was no, to five decimal places. These profiles tell you what a match will look like, not who will win it.

Luck ledger · 2026/27

— points · - - expected points · hover for any game

Match log

Game	Opponent	Score	xG	xGA	xPts	Pts
1	Cagliari	0-1	1.0	1.3	1.2	0
2	@ Juventus	0-2	0.2	1.8	1.0	0
3	Monza	1-1	0.6	2.1	0.4	1
4	@ Como	1-2	1.6	3.8	0.3	0
5	Genoa	2-1	0.9	0.9	1.3	3
6	@ Inter	0-3	0.4	2.9	0.1	0

Latest results

2026-10-10Inter3–0ParmaxG 2.9–0.4

2026-09-20Parma2–1GenoaxG 0.9–0.9

2026-09-14Como2–1ParmaxG 3.8–1.6

2026-09-06Parma1–1MonzaxG 0.6–2.1

2026-08-29Juventus2–0ParmaxG 1.8–0.2

2026-08-22Parma0–1CagliarixG 1.0–1.3