Serie A · engine xGB Current v1 · graded — the claim below was frozen before kickoff, never edited · reassessed after earlier results (rev 5)
Udinese vs Lazio
Monday 7 Sept, 19:45
Full time
1–2
chances 0.80 – 1.98 xG
✓ called — we picked LAZ; the LAZ win we priced at 35%.
The claim — frozen pre-kickoff after 5 assessments
31 · 34 · 35UDI · draw · LAZ
0–1
Likeliest LAZ win · 11%
▼ FT
UDINESE 31%DRAW 34%LAZIO 35%
Expected goals: UDI 1.10 · LAZ 1.17
Goals
Over 1.5 goals65%
Over 2.5 goals39%
Over 3.5 goals20%
Both teams score49%
Double chance
UDI or draw65%
Draw or LAZ69%
UDI or LAZno draw66%
Draw no bet
UDIstake returned on a draw47%
LAZ53%
Clean sheets
UDI clean sheet31%
LAZ clean sheet33%
Model probabilities, not odds and not advice. Our own leaderboard shows no model here beats the closing market once the bookmaker’s margin is paid.
Every scoreline, priced — tap a cell
UDI↓ LAZ→
0
1
2
3
4
5
0
1
2
3
4
5
1–2 · 7.8%
A LAZ win. 3 goals — over 2.5. Expect it roughly 8 in 100 plays. This is what happened.
What this is built from
The engine weighs
Chance quality created and conceded, both sides, all season
Opponent strength and venue
Recent play, weighted toward now
It cannot see
Confirmed lineups
Injuries and suspensions
Cup rotation plans
Thin evidence: the engine has seen little recent top-flight data on Udinese and Lazio — this assessment leans on conservative defaults more than usual.
Engine internals are proprietary. The complete performance record — including every miss — is public on the record.
Head to head · 24 meetings since 2014/15
UDI 48 drawn12 LAZ
2025/26Lazio3–3Udinese2026-04-27
2025/26Udinese1–1Lazio2025-12-27
2024/25Lazio1–1Udinese2025-03-10
2024/25Udinese2–1Lazio2024-08-24
2023/24Lazio1–2Udinese2024-03-11
Match-level assessment. No scorer projections here: we hold every appearance in this league, and a player model has been measured on it, but its probabilities came out over-confident for the players you would actually read. Recorded before kickoff, revised only until kickoff, graded after full time. Probabilities, never advice.